The field should make it easy to see which issues are linked to each entry from the project interface and The field must be required at creation and automatically set the assignee based on the selected entry are correct.

The field should make it easy to see which issues are linked to each entry from the project interface is fulfilled by the built in Components feature because components have their own management pages and integrations that list and link issues for each component in the project interface. A custom field cannot provide the same project level component listing and the automatic issue aggregation that the Components feature provides.

The field must be required at creation and automatically set the assignee based on the selected entry is also a capability tied to Components because components can have a component lead or default assignee and the system can use that value when an issue is created. Custom fields cannot natively enforce automatic reassignment of the issue based on the chosen option in the same integrated way that component leads do.

The field must permit selecting multiple values is incorrect because custom fields can be created as multi select fields and that requirement does not force use of Components only.

The field must have a preset default value when an issue is created is incorrect because custom fields support default values and a preset default is not unique to Components.

Some entries must be hidden from the selection list while remaining available for reporting is incorrect because option visibility and reporting behavior can be achieved through other mechanisms or custom field configurations and is not an exclusive capability of Components.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question