The correct option is Saved searches that reference the renamed issue type.

Saved searches that reference the renamed issue type are the most important place to check because saved filters and JQL often use the issue type display name. When the label is changed a query such as issuetype = "Old Name" will no longer match the same issues until the filter is updated, so administrators should review and update shared filters and user saved searches.

Dashboard gadgets that filter by the renamed issue type is not the best single answer because gadgets typically use saved filters or filter identifiers and will display whatever the underlying saved search returns. Fixing the saved search addresses affected gadgets.

Issue type screen schemes that reference the renamed issue type is incorrect because screen schemes map screens to issue type entities rather than to the display label. Renaming the label does not change the scheme mappings.

Global automation rules that refer to the issue type name is not the primary concern in this scenario because many automation rules reference the issue type by its identifier or adapt to label changes. The textual name in saved JQL is where users most often lose results.

Issue type schemes that include the renamed issue type is incorrect because schemes reference the type itself and are not broken by a display name change. The membership of a scheme does not depend on the label.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question