The correct option is Workflow conditions.

Workflow conditions are the right choice because workflows can include conditions and validators that explicitly check an issue's priority by its displayed name. When you change the priority labels the logic that matches those names can stop working and you must update the affected workflow conditions or switch them to use priority IDs instead.

Field configurations are not directly affected because the Priority field itself and its screen and context settings remain the same when you rename priority labels.

Automation rules are not automatically broken by a label rename because many automations operate on the underlying priority value or ID rather than the display label. If a rule explicitly referenced the old name then you would update that rule, but that is not a universal direct consequence.

Dashboards do not require a direct change simply because labels were renamed since dashboards display issue data. Some filters or gadgets that match by name might need review, but the dashboard components themselves do not need to be changed as a direct result.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question