To match calculated risk levels to the organization's risk appetite to guide decision making is correct.

This option is correct because the primary purpose of assessing and quantifying risks is to determine how those calculated risk levels compare to what the organization is willing to accept. The goal is to provide decision makers with a clear basis to prioritize responses and allocate resources according to the organization nd its risk tolerance.

Quantification supports choices such as accepting, mitigating, transferring, or avoiding risk. Matching quantified risks to the risk appetite translates measurement into action and governance so the organization can make consistent and defensible decisions.

Cloud Security Command Center is incorrect because it names a security tool rather than stating the objective of a risk assessment. Tools can help discover and monitor risks but they do not define the primary aim of assessing and quantifying those risks.

To estimate the probable financial loss associated with a risk event is incorrect because estimating financial impact is only one part of analysis. Financial estimation informs the assessment but the overarching objective is to align risks to appetite and guide decision making, not solely to compute loss figures.

To pinpoint new strategic opportunities that arise from identified risks is incorrect because identifying opportunities can be a secondary benefit but it is not the primary objective. The main focus of risk assessment and quantification is to inform how to manage risks relative to the organization nd its appetite.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question