The correct option is Adapting the framework makes it applicable to the organization's risk profile size and compliance obligations.

Frameworks offer guidance and a set of controls that must be prioritised and scaled so they fit an organisation's actual threat exposure, resources and legal requirements. Tailoring ensures controls are proportional to risk and that the organisation can meet its compliance obligations in a cost effective and demonstrable way.

This approach also supports mapping controls to existing processes and responsibilities and it helps focus remediation on the highest risk areas rather than applying effort uniformly across everything.

Cloud Security Command Center is incorrect because it names a specific security product rather than explaining why a governance or security framework needs adaptation. A product can help with monitoring or findings but it does not replace the need to tailor a framework to company circumstances.

Applying an identical framework across all companies simplifies compliance for every organization is incorrect because it assumes one size fits all. Organisations differ in size, risk profile, technology stack and regulatory obligations and applying the same controls everywhere can be inefficient or leave critical gaps.

Frameworks never gain value from benchmarking with industry peers is incorrect because benchmarking often provides useful context for maturity and targets and helps identify best practices. An absolute statement like never is rarely correct when evaluating governance and security approaches.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question