It reduces duplicated work and increases the value derived from current controls and policies is the correct option.

Aligning ISO 27001, ISO 31000 and COSO Enterprise Risk Management within a broader risk management framework reduces duplicated effort and increases the usefulness of existing controls and policies across the organization. When frameworks are mapped and integrated teams can reuse risk assessments, controls and documentation rather than performing the same activities multiple times under different standards.

This alignment also supports clearer governance and better resource prioritization because stakeholders get a consolidated view of risk and control effectiveness. That consolidated view increases the value delivered by current controls and makes audit and compliance activities more efficient.

Security Command Center is incorrect because it refers to a specific security product and not to the broad organizational advantage of aligning multiple risk frameworks. The question is about the benefit of alignment rather than a single tool.

It ensures compliance with every international law and regulation is incorrect because alignment improves the ability to manage and demonstrate compliance but it cannot guarantee compliance with all laws in every jurisdiction. Laws and regulations vary by country and industry and require targeted legal and regulatory controls.

It removes the need to perform internal audit functions is incorrect because internal audit provides independent assurance and governance oversight. Alignment can reduce duplicated testing but it does not eliminate the need for independent audits or assurance activities.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question