Regular compliance audits is the most reliable way to verify that a third party vendor follows the security and control requirements set out in the contract with the organization.

Regular compliance audits allow the hiring organization to tailor the audit scope to the exact contractual controls and obtain direct evidence. Audits provide documented findings from objective reviewers and they can include on site inspections, interviews, records review, and follow up on remediation. Regular audits also establish an ongoing verification process so the organization can track compliance over time and enforce contractual obligations.

Independent attestation reports such as SOC 2 or ISO 27001 are valuable but they are not always sufficient on their own. These reports attest to general control frameworks or a certified management system and they may not cover contract specific requirements or the current state of controls. Reports can have limited scope, time bounded testing, or exclusions that leave gaps relative to the organization s contractual needs.

Penetration testing assesses technical vulnerabilities at a point in time and it does not prove that procedural, administrative, or compliance controls required by the contract are in place or maintained. A penetration test can complement audits but it cannot substitute for a comprehensive compliance verification process.

Cloud Monitoring can provide useful telemetry about service performance and security events but it normally does not give access to the vendor s internal control evidence or contractual implementation details. Monitoring can alert to incidents but it does not replace the direct, evidence based checks that audits perform.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question