The Risk Management Framework emphasizes detailed technical and operational controls for mitigating risks while COBIT defines strategic governance objectives and management processes is correct.

The Risk Management Framework focuses on selecting implementing assessing and continuously monitoring security controls for information systems. It provides practical steps for risk assessment authorization and control implementation that guide technical and operational mitigation activities.

COBIT is an enterprise governance and management framework that defines strategic objectives processes roles and metrics to align IT with business goals. It is intended to help leaders set oversight priorities measure performance and ensure that IT supports organizational objectives rather than to prescribe specific low level technical controls.

COBIT is merely a set of low level control checklists and the Risk Management Framework is only a high level governance model is incorrect because it reverses the real scopes of the two frameworks. COBIT provides higher level governance and management guidance while the RMF gives practical steps and technical controls for securing systems.

Both frameworks are compulsory legal requirements for all organizations in the United States is incorrect because neither framework is universally mandatory. Certain federal agencies and their contractors must follow The Risk Management Framework under laws such as FISMA but most private sector organizations adopt RMF or COBIT voluntarily or to satisfy specific regulatory or contractual requirements.

Google Cloud Security Command Center is incorrect because it is a cloud security product and not a governance framework. It can help detect risks and manage cloud assets but it does not replace enterprise governance frameworks such as COBIT or implementation guidance like the Risk Management Framework.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question