Use a structured risk framework to assess and confidently pursue new market opportunities is correct because governance risk and compliance can enable growth by giving leaders a repeatable way to identify obligations assess impacts and make informed decisions before entering new markets.

A structured risk framework helps quantify and compare risks across jurisdictions and it ensures controls and evidence are in place to meet regulatory and customer expectations. This reduces uncertainty speeds approvals and supports sustainable expansion.

A structured risk framework also ties policy people and technical controls together so that monitoring tools feed into a formal risk picture. That makes compliance practical and cost effective while protecting reputation and reducing the chance of costly surprises.

Only address compliance issues after regulators impose penalties is wrong because reactive compliance exposes the organization to fines enforcement actions and reputational damage and it does not provide the predictability needed for confident expansion.

Rely exclusively on Cloud Audit Logs and Security Command Center for meeting compliance needs is wrong because those products are useful monitoring and detection tools but they do not replace governance policy risk assessment control design or the organizational processes and evidence required for compliance.

Reduce operating expenses by disregarding data privacy requirements is wrong because ignoring privacy obligations can lead to legal penalties loss of customer trust and blocked market access. Cutting corners on privacy is not a sustainable way to enable growth.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question