The correct answer is Individual IT team member preferences. This option is the least important factor when prioritizing remediation recommendations because remediation should be driven by objective and organizational criteria rather than by individual staff preferences.

Individual IT team member preferences are subject to bias and they rarely correspond to vulnerability severity, business impact, or compliance urgency. Prioritization should use measured risk, technical feasibility, and regulatory drivers so that limited resources reduce the most significant risks first.

Feasibility within the current cloud environment and platform constraints is not the least important factor because it determines which mitigations are practical to implement. An otherwise high priority fix that cannot be deployed due to platform limits will need an alternative mitigation or architectural change and that affects scheduling and effort.

Consistency with the organization risk appetite is not the least important factor because remediation decisions must align with how much residual risk the business accepts. This ensures that the team focuses on issues that exceed acceptable risk levels and preserves resources for the highest priorities.

Effect on regulatory and audit obligations is not the least important factor because compliance requirements can impose mandatory actions and deadlines. Failing to address regulatory issues can create legal and financial consequences that override personal preferences.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question