It streamlines reviews and shows the organization is prepared for assessment is correct.

Providing well organized and sufficient evidence that is mapped to specific control requirements reduces ambiguity and saves reviewers time. When evidence is linked to the control language reviewers can quickly verify compliance and focus only on exceptions rather than searching for supporting artifacts.

Clear evidence also signals that the organization has mature processes and repeatable controls. That preparedness shortens assessment cycles and reduces the administrative overhead of collecting and explaining artifacts during the audit.

Cloud Audit Logs is incorrect because the option names a specific logging product rather than describing how evidence organization affects the audit workflow. Logs can be useful evidence but the question asks about the effect of organizing and mapping evidence to controls.

It increases the number of follow up questions from assessors is incorrect because the opposite is true. Well organized, sufficient, and control-linked evidence normally reduces follow up questions since assessors can validate controls more easily and do not need extra clarification.

It conceals control gaps from auditors is incorrect because properly documented evidence does not hide gaps and attempting to conceal gaps undermines trust and can lead to more extensive findings. Good evidence helps identify and remediate gaps earlier and more transparently.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question