Make compromises through continuous collaboration among executives mission owners and security teams is the correct guiding principle for reconciling operational goals and cybersecurity concerns for a municipal services provider.

This approach recognizes that municipal services must balance availability safety and legal obligations with security. Continuous collaboration allows stakeholders to agree on acceptable risk levels prioritize protections for the most critical services and make informed trade offs when budgets or schedules constrain technical fixes.

When executives mission owners and security teams work together they align security controls with mission objectives. That alignment reduces the chance that security will be applied in ways that block essential services and it supports pragmatic decisions for incident response continuity and recovery.

Always place security above every other organizational priority is incorrect because an absolute rule ignores mission needs and practical constraints. Municipal providers must balance security with service delivery and public safety and security must be applied in a risk based manner rather than as an overriding absolute.

Security Command Center is incorrect because it names a tool or capability rather than a guiding principle. A command center can help operations and monitoring but it does not by itself resolve the tradeoffs between mission goals and security priorities.

Adopt new technologies immediately without evaluating associated risks is incorrect because acting without risk evaluation creates vulnerabilities and operational exposure. Sound governance requires assessing risks before adoption and planning compensating controls when needed.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question