The correct option is Rank suggested security controls by risk impact and available budget and staff.

Rank suggested security controls by risk impact and available budget and staff is correct because remediation should follow a risk based approach and account for organizational constraints. Prioritizing by impact and by available resources ensures that the most serious issues are addressed first and that the chosen controls are feasible to implement and maintain.

Cloud Security Command Center is not the correct choice because it is a tool rather than an assessment decision. The product can help identify and aggregate findings but naming a specific service does not replace the need to prioritize controls by risk and resources.

Apply every recommended security control regardless of cost or feasibility is incorrect because applying every recommendation without considering cost or feasibility is impractical and can waste resources. Effective remediation requires weighing risk reduction against budget and staffing and sometimes applying compensating controls or phased implementations.

Set aside discovered vulnerabilities labeled as low risk without further tracking is incorrect because low risk issues still need documentation and periodic review. Risk levels can change over time and tracking ensures that low risk items are monitored and reassessed as part of the ongoing security program.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question