The correct answer is Reduced operational control.

When you colocate equipment you physically own the servers but you place them inside a third party facility. That arrangement means the facility operator controls physical access, maintenance windows, environmental systems, power infrastructure, and many of the on site operational procedures. Those factors lead to Reduced operational control because you cannot directly manage many day to day activities the way you would in your own data center.

Potentially higher long term costs is not the primary disadvantage because colocation often reduces capital expenditure and can be cost effective compared with building and operating your own facility. Costs vary by provider and needs so it is not the defining trade off.

Complexity in maintaining compliance can be a concern but it is usually a shared responsibility. Many colocation providers offer certifications and controls that help with compliance, so the main drawback remains the loss of hands on operational control rather than compliance complexity alone.

Constraints on rapid scaling can occur if rack space or power is limited and procurement lead times exist. However scaling in a colo is often faster than building a new owned facility, so this is not the primary disadvantage when compared to reduced operational control.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question