The correct option is Hybrid cloud.

A Hybrid cloud architecture allows critical systems and sensitive data to remain under direct control while replicating workloads to multiple public cloud regions or to a secondary private site. That combination gives the business both local control and cloud scale which improves resilience for business continuity and disaster recovery.

By keeping primary control on premises and using public cloud regions or a secondary site for failover, a Hybrid cloud design enables faster failover, workload portability, and avoidance of a single provider or single location failure. Those capabilities help meet stricter recovery time and recovery point objectives.

Private cloud is incorrect because a private cloud is resilient only when it is engineered across multiple data centers and networks. Building that geographic and provider diversity solely in a private environment is often more costly and complex than using a hybrid approach.

Public cloud is incorrect because relying on a single public cloud provider can create a single provider dependency and may not satisfy all compliance or connectivity requirements for every workload. The public cloud alone may be highly resilient, but it does not by itself offer the mixed control and alternative failover paths of a hybrid model.

Community cloud is incorrect because it is shared among organizations with common needs and is not primarily designed to provide maximum resilience across diverse providers or broad geographic regions. That shared focus makes it less likely to deliver the highest level of business continuity compared with a hybrid design.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question