The correct option is To avoid accidental use of an obsolete branch and to signal that the work is complete.

In GitHub Flow you keep feature branches short lived and remove them after they are merged and the release is stable. Deleting the merged branch keeps the list of branches clean, reduces the chance that someone continues work on an outdated branch by mistake, and clearly communicates that the feature has shipped. The commits remain in the main branch and in the pull request record, so no history is lost.

To prevent all future merge conflicts related to the feature is incorrect because deleting a branch does not influence how future changes interact. Merge conflicts happen when changes overlap in the same parts of the code and they can still occur regardless of branch deletion.

To speed up git clone and fetch by shrinking repository history is incorrect because removing a branch reference does not delete commits from the repository. Clones and fetches transfer objects from the commit graph which are unchanged after a feature branch is merged and only the reference is removed.

To speed up Google Cloud Build pipelines for subsequent commits is incorrect because pipeline performance depends on the code and the pipeline configuration rather than on the presence of old merged branch references. Removing a branch does not make builds run faster.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question