The correct choice is Adopt list comprehensions in place of explicit for loops when transforming large iterables.

This technique reduces interpreter overhead per iteration and constructs the result more efficiently than repeatedly calling append inside a loop. It often yields faster execution and clearer intent when you transform many rows from large CSV files, and it fits well in a Cloud Run container that needs to balance speed and memory use.

Convert all loops to recursive function calls to shorten the code and make it appear cleaner is incorrect because it adds function call overhead on every step and is constrained by the default recursion limit. Python does not remove tail calls, so this risks stack overflows and does not provide a speedup for large datasets.

Migrate the job to Cloud Functions for better performance by default is incorrect because moving between serverless platforms does not guarantee faster execution. Performance depends on your code, runtime, and configuration, and the choice between these services is about triggers and operational model rather than raw speed.

Port the entire service to Java to gain speed without additional optimization is incorrect because language changes alone do not ensure better performance for a data parsing workload. The dominant factors are algorithms, I O patterns, and library use, and a full rewrite would add risk without guaranteeing an improvement.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question