The correct option is Developers keep ownership of code produced by GitHub Copilot and must ensure that licensing and IP obligations are met.

This is correct because Copilot provides suggestions that you may accept or modify, yet GitHub does not claim ownership of the generated output. The official terms make clear that users are responsible for reviewing suggestions and ensuring compliance with third party intellectual property rights and open source licenses. Repository owners also choose their own license and no platform action automatically changes the license of your code.

All Copilot output becomes open source under the Apache 2.0 license if committed to a public Git repository is incorrect. Making a repository public does not impose Apache 2.0 or any other license. Licenses are applied only when maintainers explicitly add them, and Copilot output is not automatically converted to open source by virtue of being pushed to a public repo.

GitHub owns all Copilot suggestions and licenses them to users under a proprietary AI code license is incorrect. GitHub states that it does not take ownership of your code or of the suggestions you choose to use, and there is no special proprietary AI code license that overrides your rights in your own projects.

Cloud Source Repositories automatically applies an MIT license to AI generated code when the repo is public is incorrect. No Git hosting service automatically assigns an MIT license simply because a repository is public. The service referenced has also been retired, which further reduces the likelihood that such a behavior would apply on newer exams.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question