The correct answer is By proposing secure patterns such as input validation and safe API usage and by flagging risky constructs while developers write and review code in Copilot Enterprise.

This approach matches how the tool assists during coding by generating context aware suggestions that encourage safer implementations such as validating inputs, parameterizing queries, and using safer APIs. It helps developers avoid insecure constructs as they type and supports efficient paths by proposing idiomatic solutions that fit the surrounding code.

During peer review it can analyze diffs to suggest review comments that highlight risky patterns or missing checks and it can summarize changes to keep collaboration smooth. This keeps security considerations close to where code is written and reviewed which improves both quality and team velocity.

Security Command Center is a Google Cloud security posture and threat management service and it is not a feature that assists developers inside the coding or pull request review experience.

By executing OWASP style security test suites on each suggestion Copilot generates is incorrect because the tool does not run automated security test suites on every suggestion and it provides suggestions and explanations rather than executing tests.

By using Cloud Build to automatically modify code in production after releases when vulnerabilities are detected is incorrect because Cloud Build is a CI and CD service and the assistant does not autonomously change production code and secure workflows rely on review and testing before deployment.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question