The correct option is Failing to give clear instructions and sufficient context within the prompt.

Off topic and inconsistent suggestions usually happen when the model is not given enough guidance about the goal, constraints, and the relevant parts of the codebase. When you explicitly state what you want, the language or framework, the expected inputs and outputs, and provide surrounding code or filenames, Copilot is more likely to stay on topic and produce stable results across iterations.

This principle improves both relevance and determinism because the assistant can align its reasoning with your stated intent and the immediate context. Clear task descriptions and concrete examples of desired behavior help the model ground its suggestions in your project rather than generic patterns.

The option Utilizing few shot examples that cover diverse patterns would typically improve relevance and consistency because good examples guide the model. This is not the principle being overlooked in the scenario.

The option Iteratively rewriting the prompt based on Copilot's first completions is a useful practice to refine outcomes, yet it assumes an initial baseline of clarity and context. The root cause described points to missing clarity rather than a lack of iteration.

The option Relying on zero shot prompts for straightforward coding tasks can be reasonable for simple work and does not by itself explain persistent off topic and inconsistent suggestions in a multi sprint setting.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question