The correct option is Copilot reads error messages and nearby code to suggest likely fixes.

This is a natural use of Copilot inside Visual Studio Code because it can look at the code you have open along with recent errors or stack traces and then propose concrete edits or explanations. It complements your existing debugger and logs rather than replacing them, which fits the team’s requirement.

When tests are flaky in a TypeScript service, Copilot can highlight suspicious asynchronous code, timing assumptions, race conditions, or type mismatches. It can suggest targeted changes such as stabilizing timers, adding deterministic data, improving mocks, or strengthening assertions. It can also draft debug prints or test refactors that you can review and run with your current tools.

Cloud Debugger is not a GitHub Copilot feature in Visual Studio Code. It also refers to a service that has been retired which makes it unlikely to be the intended solution on newer exams.

Copilot turns off breakpoints and substitutes its own simplified stack traces is incorrect because Copilot does not change your debugger configuration and it does not override or disable breakpoints. It can explain stack traces and propose fixes while you continue using your normal debugging workflow.

Copilot auto deploys hotfixes to production services without human review is incorrect because Copilot does not deploy code and any production change should go through human review and your existing CI and CD safeguards.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question