The correct options are A catalog of repositories that host shared workflow templates and reusable actions, Consistent file and folder naming rules for workflows and related artifacts, and A lifecycle and ownership plan that covers versioning and ongoing maintenance of workflows.

Documenting where shared templates and actions live establishes a single place to find reusable building blocks. This improves discovery for thousands of developers, enables clear contribution pathways, and supports governance by making ownership and permissions explicit.

Standardizing names and directory structures for workflow files and related artifacts reduces friction when reading, reviewing, and reusing automation. Placing workflows in predictable locations such as the .github directory or the .github/workflows folder and agreeing on consistent naming patterns makes navigation and search reliable across many repositories.

Defining ownership and lifecycle practices ensures reliability over time. Clear maintainers, versioning and release policies, deprecation and support timelines, and review cadences help teams safely consume updates. Pinning to tags or commit SHAs with documented change logs allows controlled adoption and rollback when needed.

Plaintext inventories of organization secrets and tokens are not appropriate because secrets must never be exposed in documentation. GitHub provides encrypted secrets and recommended patterns for rotation and least privilege, therefore the standard should describe how to manage secrets securely rather than listing them.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question