The correct answer is Anchor modeling.

Anchor modeling is a relational modeling technique that is built to represent complex many to many relationships while keeping the schema highly extensible and normalized. It models entities as anchors and relationships as ties which makes it straightforward to express many to many associations among accounts, contacts, prospects, and deals and to add new relationships without heavy schema migrations.

Anchor modeling also supports historization and a high degree of schema agility which is valuable for a client management platform that must track changes over time and evolve rapidly. The pattern maps cleanly to PostgreSQL tables and indexes so it is practical to implement on Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL.

Cloud Spanner schema design is incorrect because it targets Google Cloud Spanner which is a globally distributed NewSQL database with different data modeling practices and performance trade offs. Cloud Spanner design patterns do not directly apply to a Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL implementation.

Dimensional modeling is incorrect because it is optimized for analytical workloads and reporting with star and snowflake schemas. It is not designed to represent transactional many to many relationships with the same flexibility and evolvability that anchor modeling provides.

Entity Relationship modeling is incorrect in this context because it is a general conceptual modeling approach and it does not prescribe the specialized, normalized, and historized patterns that anchor modeling provides for complex many to many relationships and evolving schemas.

Full AWS Practitioner Certification Question